I have to admit that I'm not terribly fond of contests for nonprofits.
I worry about the time spent competing in them that might be better used on something else. I worry about the groups that don't win anything. I'm very concerned that we have too many contests. Will a staff position become necessary at nonprofits just to keep up?
I don't especially like the idea of so many companies using contests to satisfy their corporate social responsibilities (CSR). I wonder if the payoff is one-sided with most of the benefit and glory going to the company, while nonprofits chase the money like Greyhounds are motivated to chase the fake rabbit. I worry that contests are another manifestation of our lottery/casino/gambling culture. I worry that cause-marketing will devolve into nothing but contests.
I know, I worry too much.
All that said, there is something different about the Pepsi Refresh Project. It is more appealing to me than any of the contests to date for several reasons:
- I love its website. Yep, I'm a sucker for good design, bright colors, clever icons, and just all around cuteness. Pepsi Refresh is graphically sensational.
- It is not on a closed site such as Facebook. This allows Pepsi to create its own space, look, and functionality. It also opens the contest up to anyone, not just members of a closed site. There is plenty of opportunity to promote the campaign on Facebook and other sites, but it isn't restricted to that.
- The campaign features ideas, not just organizations. And there are plenty of ideas surfacing...clever ideas....helpful ideas...creative ideas. These are ideas that can take off whether or not they win any Pepsi money. A good example of crowdsourcing, just reading them is engaging and motivating.
- Anybody can submit an idea. A business, a nonprofit, a person, a group. And the ideas that are being proposed are not grandiose. They are things that anyone might try to do. In fact Pepsi insists that your idea be "feasible" and that it can be accomplished in 12 months.
- I understand it. In keeping with the simple (Pepsi calls them "shovel ready") ideas, the contest is simply constructed. I have gotten confused with some of the contests, not really understanding how they work. This one is simple and the instructions are easy to understand. Plus there is plenty of help. There is a toolkit, a clear explanation of the submission procedure, and, if your idea gets picked, good ideas to help you promote it and get votes.
- It pays attention to outcomes. The application process asks submitters to specify goals for their project and just how they will spend the money. The theme throughout is practicality and feasibility. If you vote for an idea, you know exactly what you're voting for.
- The grants come in several sizes, ranging from the $5K level, best for individuals who might want to just start something, all the way up to $250K, suitable for a well-coordinated organization. Submitters have to decide which level to go for.
- There is more than one opportunity. The contest repeats each month. So if you're not ready this month, you might be able to compete later. This provides lots of opportunities for many individuals and groups to participate.
- I had fun voting. Because the site looks great and is understandable, it is actually fun to vote. Yes, you do have to register and give up some information, but I was more willing than usual to do so.
It's clear that Pepsi has spared no expense to make this contest beautiful and appealing. Every entry chosen has its own page with goals, budget, photos, and a video if applicable. The formatting is consistent, and the site is easy to navigate. The presentation really sets a new bar for these types of contests.
My skepticism about contests is fraying at the edges with the Pepsi campaign. But am I just dazzled by the look? What do you think? What are the strong points about Pepsi Refresh? Or what are the weak spots that I've overlooked? What do you think about this type of cause marketing?
Here is some other commentary, pro and con, about the Pepsi Refresh social marketing campaign.
- Social Media is the New Super Bowl: Pepsi Refresh and What It Means to Marketers (Forrester Research)
- Social Marketing Gone Awry: Pepsi Refresh Needs To Refresh Its Security Settings (from TechCrunch)
- Pepsi Forced to Reboot Pepsi Refresh on First Day (AdAge)
- What Lessons Will Pepsi Learn About Crowdsourcing for Social Good from Chase Bank Contest Fail? (Beth's Blog)
- Pepsi Refresh Project: An Insider's View - Guest Post by Bonin Bough (Pepsi rep replies to Beth's concerns)
- Pepsi Refresh Project- Huge Potential Viral Marketing Success (Irbtrax)
- Will Pepsi profit by enlisting the public in its philanthropic efforts? (The Economist)
Photo courtesy of Pepsi Refresh


Comments
Joanne, I tend to agree with your analysis and I share your conflict between wanting companies to ‘do good’ and trying to analyze said efforts with a dispassionate eye. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with giving away $20 million, and the fact that lots of needy people/orgs can compete for those dollars is a good, if imperfectly realized way to get folks involved.
But is it marketing? I’m a doubter about CSR strategy anyway…it just seems somewhat dishonest to me, and I can’t seem to connect spending money on it to any reasonable business outcome (other than fond feelings and congratulatory media coverage). Doesn’t Pepsi have a responsibility to discover and deliver messages to consumers that are relevant, meaningful, and useful to…wait for it…buying and drinking soda pop?
I riffed on this conundrum a bit on my blog, Dim Bulb, if you’d like to check it out: http://bit.ly/dpgItD
dZG0mD http://gdjI3b7VaWpU1m0dGpvjRrcu9Fk.com
Thanks for your terrific comment, Jonathan. I read your blog too and think you raise some very good points. I like it that we have approached Pepsi Refresh from two different perspectives.
I’m in! Literally my Buttons of hope will be up for voting May 1 – i share you optimism about the way this project is unfolding – a real chance for passionate ideas to make a difference without all the usual bureaucracy..wish me luck and vote for me may 1, 2010 http://www.refresheverything.com/buttonsofhope
I came across your blog while doing a search for the Pepsi contest. I know of one non-profit who has been trying for the $250,000 grant for a few months now. They encourage friends on various websites to vote. Nothing wrong with that except the non-profit states on its website that it is a 501 (c)(3) organization and that cannot be corroborated. They are not listed as such on the IRS official website nor on guidestar.
This is troubling. Especially since the founder of the non-profit has been accused by people on a social website he frequents of having previouslly run a diploma mill and of having obtained his PhD through a diploma mill.
I wonder how much Pepsi checks out those who win these grants to make sure they are exactly what they say they are.
This was an interesting article, and helped put a more positive spin on the contest. Now, please vote for me at
http://www.refresheverything.com/autismadultsmd and search under autism Maryland if you can’t find it. Also, you can text your vote 103413 to 73774 .
I wish it were possible for an individual to win this. It’s hard to compete with an org who can vote many times.